“That ‘metastases’ exist, is one of the many unproven, even fraudulent, hypotheses of academic medicine.  One imagines that the cancer cells of a tumour migrate and settle down somewhere in another organ.  The fact of the matter is that a cancer cell has never been found in a drop of arterial blood, i.e. been proven.  Due to the danger of contagion, it would be medically obvious that the blood of donors should be checked for cancer cells, but that is not done!”

~Dr. Hamer, from Germanische Heilkunde – Introduction

So if there are no metastases in the way we’ve been programmed to believe by academic medicine, then what is going on when people get secondary or tertiary cancers?

These are further DHS’s, which often happen due to the actual cancer diagnosis.

How would you feel if you went to the doctor with a concern due to a lump on your breast and you were told “this is a malignant breast cancer and you have a 10% chance of survival”?

Would that not shock you to the core?  You would suddenly feel the ground move out from under your feet.

The three elements of a DHS are here contained in this diagnosis: Acute and dramatic, catches you off guard, makes you feel isolated.

As an example, a common “diagnostic shock”, as Dr. Hamer would call this, is the death fright conflict.  You’ve been told you will most likely die.  This shock leads to a new SBS, now on the lung alveoli.

Now, it’s not just a breast cancer but also a lung cancer that’s misdiagnosed as a metastases.

An alternative is that you could interpret it as a severe self-devaluation conflict, because you will now lose your breast.  So this could affect the bone of the sternum or ribs.  Now you will be diagnosed with a bone cancer.

Perhaps it hits you in both ways and you have three cancers now – breast, lung and bone – instead of just one.

Can you begin to see the insanity of the current paradigm, which is full of fear-mongering and the arrogant pronunciations of a person’s death with no true knowledge or proof?

“Now we also know why animals almost never get so-called ‘metastases’ (‘second cancers’ would be correct).  Luckily, the dog does not understand when uncle doctor tells his master: ‘Your dog has cancer…’ .  Flocki, at the most, will wag his tail, glad that the examination is over.  Therefore, he does not get an additional DHS and, thereby, no second cancer!”

~Dr. Hamer, from Germanische Heilkunde – Introduction

One major reason people die with cancer is from the treatment.

Chemotherapy and radiation and other strong drugs are not friendly to the body.  These treatments in themselves can kill a person.

As you may have read in the previous tab, often the person suffers further DHS’s from the diagnostic shock when told by the doctor that they have cancer.  This creates secondary and tertiary cancers.  Now the person is stuck in the medical system and will be pumped even more with toxic and dangerous treatments.

Other people can die from emaciation if they get stuck in a hanging active conflict course (see above about tracks).  This is because the body never gets out of prolonged stress and basically eats itself up.

Further, if someone has an endoderm cancer, for example in the colon or the lungs, which is unresolved and continues in a hanging active conflict phase, that tumor will continue to grow and grow and can cause complications.  This is why the causal therapy of GHk to find the original DHS and resolve it is so key.  If you operate on a tumor which grows in the conflict active phase, but do not resolve the original DHS, the tumor will simply grow back because there is a purpose in what the body is doing.  This is another ticket on the sick cycle carousel of surgery, radiation, etc.  In the meantime, the body is emaciating, weaker and weaker to deal with the onslaught of these “treatments”.

Another complication which is unfortunately quite common is what Dr. Hamer called “the syndrome”.  This is a combination of two SBS’s.  There’s the first one, the original “cancer” which arrives to the pcl-phase.  Then on top of that a diagnosis shock or a hospitalization, where someone is torn from the people they love and isolated in a sterile environment, can lead to a further SBS in the kidney collecting tubules due to this perceiving this as an existence/abandonment conflict.  In order to survive the perceived threat to existence, the kidneys begin to retain water.  This liquid ends up going especially to the tissue that’s in the pcl-phase of the first SBS, as well as to the Hamer Focus in the brain.  Now the edema is too much and can cause fatal complications like a stroke.

Cancer is not the body deteriorating or killing itself.  It’s not something attacking the body.  It’s not unruly cells which have rebelled.

What can kill is our lack of knowledge coupled with fear, anxiety and toxic treatments.

“If I were to become ill with cancer, then I would under no circumstances allow myself to be treated in a conventional cancer centre.  Only those cancer victims who keep their distance from such centres have a chance of survival.”

~Prof. Dr. Charles Mathe, oncologist and former head physician of the National French Cancer Centre in Villejuif near Paris, writing after his retirement.

GHk is not about doing nothing.

It’s about understanding what is happening in the body.  First and foremost, we need to shift our mindset and recognize that there is a specific biological meaning and purpose for what is happening.

From this place of knowledge and trust the therapy can happen, but not from a place of fear or belief that the body is failing.

GHk therapy, as explained above, is causal therapy.  You must address the cause.  This gives you the timeline and a better perspective of how long the symptoms will last and how intense they can be.

Staying calm is one of the most important parts of the therapy, to avoid further DHS’s which can complicate the healing process.  Finding ways to stay peaceful and centered is essential to the process.  It should go without saying that you need to give the body the rest it needs rather than pushing yourself to work and live as you normally do.  Connection to loved ones who can support you is also an important key.  While you are in healing, you will need to stay away from anyone who stimulates fear or anxiety.

Becoming aware of and resolving or avoiding tracks is fundamental, as explained above.

After these basic fundamental aspects of therapy, there are details which depend from case to case.

Ensuring you have bacteria always present in your system is imperative for biological healing to take place, and Dr. Hamer recommended raw milk, for example, to make sure you have the microbes you need before an SBS even happens.

With an SBS in an endoderm organ, having adequate protein is a must for the pcl-phase as the tubercular bacteria consume a lot of protein during this phase.

In some cases it could be necessary to use some medication to ease the pcl-phase, but not stop it.

If there is an intense epi-crisis, a sympathicatonic substance such as coffee can be necessary to strengthen it even more in order to avoid going into a extremely deep and fatal vagatonia straight after.

Certain surgeries may be necessary in the case of a tumor which has grown too big and has begun obstructing digestion, for example.  But then it is important to understand the Hamer Compass to know when and how to do surgery.  For example, it is extremely important not to operate on an ovarian cyst until after nine months, when it has hardened, or you can turn an ovarian cyst into endometriosis.

There are times the skull or the lung pleura might have to be punctured to let pressure out from too much edema in the pcl-phase due to an intense conflict load.

There are also conflicts, such as those which affect the coronary arteries or veins, which should not be solved after a certain amount of time.  If the conflict load is too much, the person may not survive the epi-crisis of the pcl-phase.  In these cases, it’s actually necessary to downgrade but not look for resolution.  This is also therapy.

So you see, the therapy in GHk is extremely diverse and individual.  Many different factors must be taken into account, and there are no protocols; no one-size-fits-all.

This is individual healing.

Yet again, here is a concept which doesn’t happen in the way we’ve been programmed to believe.

There is no single scientific study which has ever proved that any microorganism causes a particular so-called disease.  In fact, scientific studies around this theme do not even use a control, which violates the scientific method and invalidates the study.

Further, Louis Pasteur’s germ theory, which has been our indoctrination since we came into this world, has never been more than a supposition.  There is no scientific proof for the theory and was proven wrong already by contemporaries of Pasteur.

Additionally, although bacteria and bacteriophages have been isolated and shown to exist, there has actually never been a virus isolated according to what’s called Koch’s postulates:

1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism should cause disease.
4. The microorganism must then be reisolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.

These postulates seem quite reasonable, and yet they have never been fulfilled.

Virologists determine DNA sequences of so-called viruses based on pieces of broken down cellular debris and then use computer programs to fill in the missing pieces to create whole genomes, a process known as xxxxxxxx.

Dr. Mark Bailey’s paper, A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition), goes into the history of the scientific experiments in the field of virology and shows the flaws in the scientific method and the absence of proof of viruses as the cause of disease.

So what is really happening?  There’s no one answer for this, because each instance can have a different cause.  But here are some common occurrences:

• A mass number of individuals in a community suffer the same DHS with a common conflict due to shocking and frightening news of war, a pandemic, etc.  This can often show up as a death-fright conflict in the lung alveoli which will present in conventional medicine as coughing with fever and chills, or pneumonia, or lung cancer, etc.
• Someone in the house suffers an annoyance conflict and presents with what is normally called “the common cold” and their partner, for example, feels annoyed with the sneezing, afraid they’ll “get sick”.  Subsequently they suffer an annoyance conflict and will therefore present with another “common cold”, giving the appearance of having “caught a cold”.
• There is a death in the family and each member will “get sick” but possibly in different ways, depending on how they interpreted the death:  separation conflict, starvation conflict, loss conflict, etc.
• Many young children experience the shocking separation from their teacher who is suddenly absent from school.  When they resolve their conflict because they either get used to the substitute teacher, or the original teacher returns, those who were shocked with the separation now go into pcl-phase and this presents as rashes all over the body, known as “chickenpox”.  Some of the children will have it and others not, because not every psyche reacts the same way to the same event.

These are some brief examples to show you how “contagion” actually works.

If there are symptoms, there must have been a DHS.  If many people have the same symptoms, they all suffered the same type of DHS.  If they have symptoms at different times, they resolved the conflict at different times.

Germanische Heilkunde is individual, but can be seen in the context of community, because we are living side by side and experiencing life in very similar ways, including in the shocks we perceive.